#1
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
74,000 yen/mo
40.37 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.706
RX38 live rental inventory benchmark
89,521 active rental properties, reduced to useful recommendation slates.
GHQOS processed a sanitized RX38 current active-inventory export from July 13, 2026. The benchmark compares persona scoring, C0 individual ranking, C1 diverse-slate optimization, and reduced S0/S1 local quantum-simulation experiments without exposing addresses, building names, contact data, URLs, source identifiers, or raw file paths.
Current front report: 89,521 active rental properties. The earlier 7,890-property Tokyo 23-ward demo remains available for comparison.
Open earlier 7,890 demoDataset funnel
From raw active-inventory rows to matchable records
91,442
raw rows
raw rows
89,521
deduplicated properties
deduplicated properties
83,731
validated records
validated records
C0
persona ranking
persona ranking
C1
diverse slate
diverse slate
8 finalists
S0/S1 simulation
S0/S1 simulation
S0 and S1 did not search all 83,731 validated records. They ran only on a deliberately reduced eight-finalist problem.
Coverage
Active inventory cohorts
Counts are sanitized aggregate cohorts. They do not imply complete national coverage or current availability after the scrape time.
Data quality
What the benchmark could use
- Rent parseable: 100.0%
- Area parseable: 98.3%
- Municipality or ward recognized: 95.3%
- Station walk parsed: 97.7%
- Date-window parseable: 94.1%
Freshness semantics
Current inventory, not a time series
The export is interpreted as one current active-inventory dataset as of July 13, 2026. Older date-window values describe listing-age or search-window freshness context, not inactive past snapshots.
Oldest window end observed in sanitized summary: 2024-12-31. Newest window end observed: 2026-07-12.
Seven fixed personas
Complete-inventory benchmark matrix
Each cell shows feasible candidates, C0/C1 top-eight overlap, geographic diversity, and hard-constraint compliance for the full validated inventory cohort.
| Persona | Pittari ぴったり | Sukoshi Hirogeru 少し広げる | Bouken 冒険 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety-oriented single renter | 26,7773/8 overlap3 areas100.0% hard constraints | 33,1552/8 overlap4 areas100.0% hard constraints | 36,8192/8 overlap3 areas100.0% hard constraints |
| Commute-first urban renter | 21,5422/8 overlap3 areas100.0% hard constraints | 29,6382/8 overlap4 areas100.0% hard constraints | 34,0322/8 overlap5 areas100.0% hard constraints |
| Space-and-quiet renter | 16,1245/8 overlap2 areas100.0% hard constraints | 18,9414/8 overlap3 areas100.0% hard constraints | 24,2193/8 overlap5 areas100.0% hard constraints |
| Creative/lifestyle renter | 30,0684/8 overlap2 areas100.0% hard constraints | 35,3623/8 overlap3 areas100.0% hard constraints | 38,6253/8 overlap4 areas100.0% hard constraints |
| Future-family renter | 13,5653/8 overlap4 areas100.0% hard constraints | 15,8652/8 overlap4 areas100.0% hard constraints | 20,4552/8 overlap5 areas100.0% hard constraints |
| Affordability-first renter | 24,9174/8 overlap2 areas100.0% hard constraints | 28,3964/8 overlap3 areas100.0% hard constraints | 35,8663/8 overlap4 areas100.0% hard constraints |
| Exploration/adventure renter | 37,2593/8 overlap3 areas100.0% hard constraints | 43,0502/8 overlap4 areas100.0% hard constraints | 52,4812/8 overlap3 areas100.0% hard constraints |
Example recommendation behavior
Safety-oriented single renter across three exploration modes
Pittari / ぴったり
Strict fit. Keeps budget, area, station walk, commute, and location constraints tight.
Feasible candidates26,777
C0/C1 overlap3/8
Ward diversity3
Hard constraints100.0%
Slate mix: condominium 8. Ward mix: Chuo 6, Minato 1, Kita 1. Median rent: 78,000 yen/mo. Median area: 40.37 sqm.
#2
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
78,000 yen/mo
40.37 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.705
#3
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
74,000 yen/mo
40.37 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.702
#4
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
68,000 yen/mo
57.11 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.699
#5
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
78,000 yen/mo
40.37 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.694
#6
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
99,500 yen/mo
35.61 sqm
2 min walk
score 0.682
#7
Minato Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
84,000 yen/mo
24.72 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.670
#8
Kita Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
82,000 yen/mo
59.13 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.658
Sukoshi Hirogeru / 少し広げる
Moderate relaxation. Opens the candidate universe and lets C1 choose a more varied slate.
Feasible candidates33,155
C0/C1 overlap2/8
Ward diversity4
Hard constraints100.0%
Slate mix: condominium 8. Ward mix: Chuo 5, Kita 1, Minato 1, Sumida 1. Median rent: 78,000 yen/mo. Median area: 40.37 sqm.
#1
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
74,000 yen/mo
40.37 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.715
#2
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
74,000 yen/mo
40.37 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.712
#3
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
68,000 yen/mo
57.11 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.708
#4
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
78,000 yen/mo
40.37 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.704
#5
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
99,500 yen/mo
35.61 sqm
2 min walk
score 0.692
#6
Kita Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
82,000 yen/mo
59.13 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.670
#7
Minato Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
65,000 yen/mo
36.89 sqm
2 min walk
score 0.668
#8
Sumida Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
115,000 yen/mo
32.97 sqm
2 min walk
score 0.660
Bouken / 冒険
Exploratory search. Broadens alternatives and increases diversity weighting while preserving the declared hard-boundary checks.
Feasible candidates36,819
C0/C1 overlap2/8
Ward diversity3
Hard constraints100.0%
Slate mix: condominium 8. Ward mix: Chuo 4, Kita 3, Minato 1. Median rent: 74,000 yen/mo. Median area: 40.37 sqm.
#1
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
74,000 yen/mo
40.37 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.723
#2
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
74,000 yen/mo
40.37 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.720
#3
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
68,000 yen/mo
57.11 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.717
#4
Chuo Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
78,000 yen/mo
40.37 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.713
#5
Kita Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
82,000 yen/mo
59.13 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.682
#6
Minato Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
65,000 yen/mo
36.89 sqm
2 min walk
score 0.677
#7
Kita Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
61,000 yen/mo
34.49 sqm
3 min walk
score 0.666
#8
Kita Condominium
Sanitized candidate. Ward-level only; no address, building name, phone, company, URL, or raw source identifier.
71,000 yen/mo
29.0 sqm
1 min walk
score 0.666
Execution boundary
What GHQOS did
- C0 execution: GHQOS classical persona ranking.
- C1 execution: GHQOS quantum-inspired optimization.
- S0/S1 execution: GHQOS local quantum simulation.
- Backend architecture: provider-adapter compatible.
- Physical QPU used: No.
GHQOS uses a provider-neutral backend adapter architecture designed to support multiple computing and quantum-platform partners. Specific backend implementation details are maintained internally.
Truth panel
Public claims kept narrow
physical_qpu_usedfalse
S0/S1 simulator_usedtrue
benchmark verificationtrue
public safety scanclean
source unchangedtrue
Namazuseparate layer
quantum advantagenot claimed
tests62 passed
Publication-safe wording
What this page can say
- GHQOS processed a sanitized current active-rental export.
- It generated persona-aware recommendation slates across three exploration modes.
- C1 intentionally optimizes a slate, so it may differ from C0 individual ranking.
- S0/S1 are reduced local simulator experiments on eight finalists.
What this page must not imply
Limitations
- No claim that listings remain available after the July 13, 2026 scrape.
- No claim of complete Tokyo or national inventory coverage.
- No raw source database, exact address, building name, phone, company, URL, or source identifier is published here.
- No physical quantum computer execution and no quantum-advantage claim.
- Derived commute/style values are matching features, not observed source facts.